The backchannel has really become my favorite tool of choice when I'm presenting. I've purchased an inexpensive ad-free chat room at Chatzy that is password protected and use it for my backchannels when I present.
I like to find two people to help: one to serve as Google Jockey (a/k/a Link dropper) and another to serve as a moderator -- posing questions to me when I take a breath and ask.
Gomeric Hill talked about the backchannel on a blog post.
"The WebEx interface they were using to present Vicki’s Flat Classroom project has a chat that was used throughout her presentation as a backchannel discussion. As Vicki talked, the conversation in the chat replied to her, responded to her, posted questions for her and assisted with answering questions without Vicki’s help. Sometimes the chat updated slowly and at other times, the information was being added so quickly it was hard to keep up with the glut of information being added to the chat. I learned as much from the backchannel discussion as I did from Vicki..."
Here was my response:
I think this is a great post for several reasons:
1) It demonstrates HOW things are happening now. A viral mashup of services, stream of activity and happy accidents.
2) It also demonstrates the power of the backchannel. I personally believe that the backchannel is the greatest unharnessed resource that we as educators have available to us. It does not threaten me nor bother me that you learned as much if not more from the backchannel the other night -- in fact, it makes me feel great that I facilitated the connection.
I believe a good presenter pushes the backchannel to do more by asking questions of it, encouraging the backchannel to communicate and share, and prodding it to communicate about the topic at hand.
I wonder if it is the "sage on the stage" type environment we've all grown up in that makes us THINK that the best thing on the menu should be the "main course" -- the presenter. When, in fact, the backchannel has so many more people involved -- really, it should give the most resources and insights and just add to what the presenter is saying.
Of course, there is backchannel netiquette as we discussed, however, I thought the backchannel was phenomenal.
Kudos on a great post!
These are RSS feeds or searches enabled by the use of a twitter search engine like Terraminds -- searching on a keyword.
With our Twitter Bookgroup, a person can join the bookgroup and then just type @bookgroup in their response and it will appear on the RSS feed. (Note: You must have your responses allowed in the public areas of twitter and not be protected.)
See what this looks like at the Terraminds @bookgroup search -- so to make this simple -- it is aggregating all of the people discussing the book and we didn't really have to do anything except just create a wiki. @digitalmaverick is the bookgroup mastermind and it is starting to take shape.
So, let me pose these questions:
1) What if some teachers coordinated a group skype discussion and enabled a backchannel chat with their students between the classes?
2) What if we came up with a twitter group for the major pieces of literature and set up a wiki page for each of them -- we could aggregate the thoughts of students and they could even send thoughts to it from their cell phones?
3) What if we just came up with a few standards of keywords to use for books or events or just about anything to aggregate the thoughts of students or teachers.
I'm trying this out -- if you'll go to your twitter account and type in #cw2 and then put a cool web 2 website, we should be able to follow the RSS feed for this at - http://terraminds.com/twitter/query?query=%23cw2&submit=search+in+updates once it populates.
Just think about what happens when we connect. Let's use our minds here and we can really come up with some useful ways to give more students a global audience without inundating us all with too much.
tag: backchannel, twitter, web 2.0, web2, education, teaching, microblogging